The Evolution of Agency: From Somatic Burden to Cognitive Orchestration

Introduction: The Ontology of Accomplishment

The phrase "I Did It!" functions as a linguistic seal on the human experience of agency. It is a declarative statement that binds the subject ("I") to an outcome ("It") through the mechanism of action ("Did"). However, the nature of this mechanism—the "doing"—has undergone a metamorphosis so profound that it challenges the very biological and psychological substrates of human satisfaction. For the vast majority of our species' history, the assertion of achievement was inextricably bound to the expenditure of caloric energy and the manipulation of physical matter. The prototype of accomplishment was the hunter returning with prey or the carrier arriving with water; the validity of the claim was authenticated by the fatigue of the body.

In the contemporary era, specifically within the accelerating epoch of Artificial Intelligence, the ontology of "doing" has fractured. A modern knowledge worker can legitimately claim "I Did It!" after deploying complex algorithmic systems to execute projects that would have historically required months of collective human labor, all while remaining physically static. This report serves as a foundational context for a book examining this shift. It investigates the trajectory from the "Water Carrier"—the embodiment of survival-based, high-effort, low-leverage labor—to the "AI Orchestrator"—the embodiment of high-leverage, low-friction, cognitive management.

We must recognize that this is not merely a technological transition but an anthropological rupture. We are moving from a world where agency was defined by the overcoming of physical resistance to a world where agency is defined by the clarity of intent. This report synthesizes anthropological insights, psychological theories of effort justification, historical art analysis, and modern technological trends to map the changing landscape of human satisfaction. The analysis is structured to provide deep, actionable context, thematic pillars, and visual references for a comprehensive book on the subject.

Chapter I: The Biology of Burden – Anthropological Roots of "Doing"

To understand the modern crisis of meaning in automated work, one must first confront the evolutionary baseline from which humanity has deviated. The user’s reference to walking ten kilometers for water is not a mere metaphor for difficulty; it is a precise invocation of the ancestral condition that shaped our neurobiology.

1.1 The Water Carrier: An Evolutionary Archetype

The act of fetching water represents one of the most primal and enduring forms of human labor. It is a task that allows for no abstraction. Water is heavy—weighing one kilogram per liter—essential for survival, and often geographically distant from human settlement. In the anthropological record, the water carrier is not merely a laborer but a linchpin of survival, and the "I Did It" of the water fetcher is the foundational unit of human achievement.

1.1.1 The Physiology of Scarcity

Evolutionary anthropology suggests that human physiology was explicitly shaped by the need for endurance and resource transport in arid environments. Research comparing human water turnover with other primates indicates that humans evolved to be a "water-saving ape," capable of venturing significantly further from water sources than our closest relatives, such as chimpanzees.1 This adaptation implies that the long-distance carrying of water was a defining selection pressure in human evolution.

When an ancestral human walked ten kilometers to retrieve water, the "doing" was validated by the body itself. The burning of muscles, the sensation of weight on the shoulders, the regulation of thirst, and the sheer caloric expenditure created a somatic feedback loop. The value of the water was physically encoded in the effort required to obtain it. The "I Did It" was not an intellectual abstraction; it was a physiological reality. The survival of the individual and the group depended on this high-effort, low-leverage labor. The "water-saving" physiology of humans is a testament to a history where "doing" meant traversing landscape and enduring scarcity.1

1.1.2 The Sociality of the Well

In pre-industrial and foraging societies, the labor of "doing" was rarely solitary. The water source—whether a stream, a well, or an oasis—served as a critical node of social organization. The act of carrying water, while arduous, was embedded in a communal context. Anthropological critiques of modern labor definitions often highlight that contemporary concepts of "work" exclude these social dimensions, focusing solely on output rather than the relational fabric woven through shared exertion.2

The "I" in the ancestral "I Did It" was often implicitly a "We." The trek to the water source was a time for communication, bonding, and the reinforcement of social hierarchies and norms. The labor was visible to the tribe. A carrier returning with a full vessel was immediately recognized as a contributor to the collective survival. This visibility of effort provided a clear, unmediated status signal. In contrast, the modern AI implementer works in a "black box," where the effort is invisible and the social context is often nonexistent. The shift from the village well to the solitary screen represents a loss of the "social nourishment" that accompanied physical labor.3

1.2 The Psychology of the Slog: Effort Justification

Why does the water carried over ten kilometers taste sweeter than the water poured from a tap? This question strikes at the heart of the "Effort Justification" paradigm, a core concept in social psychology that explains why humans attach greater value to outcomes that require significant sacrifice.

1.2.1 Cognitive Dissonance and Value Inflation

Effort justification functions as a defense mechanism against cognitive dissonance. If an individual expends vast amounts of energy for a trivial result, the psychological tension is resolved by inflating the perceived value of the result. The logic is internal and compelling: "I worked hard for this; therefore, it must be valuable".5

This mechanism is not merely a cognitive bias; it is rooted in our neurobiology. Neural research utilizing EEG has shown that the subjective experience of effort modulates the neural response to rewards. A specific brain signal known as "Reward Positivity" (RewP) is amplified when the preceding effort is high. This suggests that the human brain is hardwired to enjoy the fruits of hard labor more intensely than "free" rewards. The "slog"—the painful, tedious exertion—primes the brain to receive the reward with maximum satisfaction.7

This biological reality presents a profound paradox for the AI age. If technology removes the effort (the 10km walk) and delivers the reward instantly (the completed project), do we chemically deprive ourselves of the capacity to value the achievement? The user’s query touches on this anxiety: the suspicion that the "easy" victory of AI implementation is nutritionally empty compared to the "hard" victory of physical endurance.

1.2.2 The Ritual of Competence

In hunter-gatherer societies, the difficulty of the task was a measure of competence. The hunter who tracked prey for days or the gatherer who knew the location of distant water sources possessed high-value information and skills. The "I Did It" was a claim to mastery over the environment. It demonstrated that the individual could impose their will on a recalcitrant world.

The "Original Affluent Society" theory, proposed by anthropologist Marshall Sahlins, challenged the view that hunter-gatherers were miserable wretches. Instead, it suggested that by wanting little and knowing how to get it, they achieved a kind of affluence. However, this affluence was based on a direct, skilled engagement with nature.8 The modern "affluence" of AI abundance is different; it is based on the bypass of nature. The anxiety of the modern user ("I did it... but did I?") stems from the fear that they have bypassed the competence-building phase entirely.

1.3 Comparative Analysis: The Water Carrier vs. The AI Orchestrator

Chapter II: The Mechanics of Alienation – From Hand to Machine

The transition from the "Water Carrier" to the "AI Implementer" was not instantaneous. It occurred through a series of technological ruptures that progressively distanced the human body from the object of its labor. To write a book on how "I Did It!" has changed, one must map the intermediate steps where the "It" became separated from the "I."

2.1 The Aqueduct: The First Automation of "Doing"

The first major disruption to the "I walked 10kms" narrative was the invention of the aqueduct and the development of hydraulic engineering. In ancient Rome, and earlier in Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley, engineering began to replace the daily walk.

2.1.1 The Engineering of Ease

Roman aqueducts utilized gravity—a natural force—to perform the work of thousands of carriers. The Pont du Gard or the Aqua Claudia were monumental assertions that the state could abolish the "10km walk." The "I Did It" shifted from the carrier to the engineer and the emperor who commissioned the work. For the average citizen, water transformed from an achievement to a utility. It was no longer something one did; it was something one had.9

This historical moment is critical context for the book. It represents the first time humanity successfully "scaled" a survival task. The result was an explosion of urbanization and hygiene, but also the beginning of the "invisibility" of infrastructure. Just as moderns do not think about the complex routing of TCP/IP packets when they send an email, Romans ceased to think about the mountain springs when they visited the baths. The "doing" was buried in the stone channels, just as it is now buried in the silicon chips.12

2.1.2 Visual Contrast: The Carrier vs. The Arch

Visual references for this section should contrast the organic, strained lines of the human water carrier with the rigid, repetitive geometry of the aqueduct.

• Visual Reference A: The Water Carriers by Daniel Ridgway Knight (1892) or Frank Duveneck (1884). These paintings depict the human element—often women—carrying copper vessels. The posture is one of balance and burden. The figures are grounded, connected to the earth.
• Visual Reference B: Photography or engravings of Roman Aqueducts (e.g., Pont du Gard). The visual language is one of dominance over nature. The arches march across the landscape, indifferent to the terrain. The water is hidden, flowing effortlessly above the ground.
• Synthesis: The transition from the curved spine of the carrier to the stone arch of the aqueduct symbolizes the transition from somatic agency to structural agency.13

2.2 The Industrial Revolution: Machine as the New Muscle

The second massive rupture was the Industrial Revolution, where the machine replaced the muscle entirely, and the human became an attendant to the gear.

2.2.1 The Fragmentation of the "I"

Frederick Winslow Taylor’s principles of scientific management (Taylorism) fundamentally altered the "I Did It" by breaking tasks into such small components that no single worker could claim the whole. The shoemaker who once made the entire shoe could say "I made this." The factory worker who operated the sole-stamping machine could only say "I stamped this." The sense of "I Did It" (completed a whole object) was fractured into "I did my part".2

2.2.2 Art as Evidence: The Subjugation of the Body

Art history provides a vivid record of this transition, offering powerful imagery for the book.

• The Romantic/Realist Resistance: Jean-François Millet’s painting The Man with the Hoe (1862) and the accompanying poem by Edwin Markham serve as a profound anchor for the "hard labor" perspective. The painting depicts a peasant leaning on a hoe, exhausted, "bowed by the weight of centuries." He is "dead to rapture and despair." Yet, there is a undeniable reality to his existence. He is in direct contact with the earth. The poem asks, "Whose breath blew out the light within this brain?"—a prescient question for the AI age where the "light" of cognitive effort is being outsourced.15
• The Industrial Sublime: Contrast this with Lewis Hine’s iconic photograph Powerhouse Mechanic (1920). Here, the worker is muscular and heroic, but he is visually integrated into the machinery of the steam pump. He is bent over, tightening a nut, his body mirroring the curve of the metal. He is not fighting the earth; he is serving the engine. The "I Did It" is now shared with the machine. The worker is a "human motor," powerful but componentized.18
• The Precisionist Erasure: In the Precisionist movement (e.g., Charles Sheeler, Georgia O'Keeffe's cityscapes), the human figure often disappears entirely. We see the pristine geometry of factories and skyscrapers, but no workers. This foreshadows the digital age, where the human presence in the "factory" of the server room is non-existent. The "I Did It" has become abstract; the city builds itself.20

2.3 The "Machine Stops" Prophecy

No discussion of this topic is complete without referencing E.M. Forster’s 1909 short story, The Machine Stops. It is the literary mirror to the user's "10km walk vs. AI project" dichotomy.

• The Narrative of Dependency: Forster describes a future where humanity lives underground in isolation, with every need met by a global Machine. "I want music," says the protagonist Vashti, and music plays. "I want a bed," and a bed appears.
• The Atrophy of Experience: Vashti considers direct experience "barbaric." She prefers the "idea" of things to the things themselves. This parallels the modern shift from "doing" to "prompting."
• The Rebellion of the Body: The character Kuno rebels by climbing to the surface to see the stars with his own eyes. He walks. He scrapes his skin. He engages in the "10km walk" of his era to reclaim his agency from the Machine. His "I Did It" is a physical reclamation of his humanity. The story serves as a warning: when the Machine does everything, the human loses the capacity to do anything. It predicts the "helplessness" that ensues when the system fails.21

Chapter III: The Digital Abstraction – Agency in the Age of Algorithms

The current era represents the third rupture: the cognitive revolution. We have moved from outsourcing muscle (aqueducts/steam engines) to outsourcing mind. The user's second statement—"I implemented 2 big projects all using AI, in 2 days"—is the definitive manifesto of this new era.

3.1 The Evolution of Software Development: A Case Study in Abstraction

The history of coding is a history of increasing abstraction, moving the "I Did It" further from the "metal."

• The "Water Carrier" Phase (Machine Code): Early computing required physically plugging cables (ENIAC) or punching cards. The programmer was physically intimate with the machine's logic. A mistake was a physical error.
• The "Aqueduct" Phase (High-Level Languages): Languages like C, Java, and Python abstracted the binary. The programmer wrote logic, not memory addresses. "I coded this" meant "I wrote the logic."
• The "Commander" Phase (AI Generation): With tools like GitHub Copilot, GPT-4, and Devin, the user moves from "writing" to "requesting." The prompt "Create a website for a shoe store" replaces thousands of lines of manual typing.
• The Productivity Paradox: Studies show developers using AI agents can code up to 55% faster. However, this speed comes with a "Junior Developer Extinction" crisis. The junior developer historically learned by doing the "grunt work" (the water carrying). If AI does the grunt work, how does the junior ever become a senior? We are creating a generation of "Architects" who have never been "Builders," potentially leading to a fragility in our technical infrastructure.24

3.2 The Sense of Agency (SoA) in Human-Computer Integration

Neuroscience defines the Sense of Agency (SoA) as the feeling that "I am the one who is causing or generating an action."

• The "I Did That" vs. "The System Did That" Tension: As technology becomes more autonomous, the boundary blurs. When an AI generates a poem or a codebase, does the prompter feel pride? Or do they feel like a spectator?
• Research Findings: Studies suggest that as automation increases, SoA decreases. However, the field of "Human-Computer Integration" seeks to blur this by making the tech feel like an extension of the body. The goal is "symbiosis," but the risk is "parasitism." The user may feel powerful, but they are actually passive.28

3.3 The IKEA Effect in the Digital Realm

How do we reconcile the ease of AI with the need for satisfaction? The answer may lie in the IKEA Effect: the cognitive bias where people place a disproportionately high value on products they partially created.30

• Application to AI: Does typing a prompt trigger the IKEA Effect?
  • The "Assembly" Hypothesis: If the user has to "wrangle" the AI—correcting its hallucinations, refining the prompt, iterating the code, integrating the output—this friction acts as "mental assembly." It provides just enough difficulty to trigger the IKEA effect, allowing the user to feel "I Did It!" even if the AI did 90% of the heavy lifting.
  • The "One-Click" Trap: If the AI becomes too good (zero-shot perfection), the IKEA effect vanishes. The user becomes a consumer, not a creator. The satisfaction relies on the friction of the tool. The "2 days" of work mentioned by the user likely contained enough friction to validate the achievement. If it had taken 2 seconds, the satisfaction would likely be zero.

3.4 The "One-Person Unicorn" and the Economics of Solitude

The user's ability to implement "2 big projects in 2 days" points to the emergence of the "One-Person Unicorn"—a theoretical billion-dollar company run by a single individual using AI agents.32

3.4.1 Hyper-Leverage vs. Social Isolation

• Hyper-Leverage: A single individual can now wield the operational capacity of a 50-person department. This fulfills the "I Did It" fantasy of total control and autonomy. It is the ultimate amplification of the individual will.
• The Sociological Cost: The "Water Carrier" had the village well. The "One-Person Unicorn" has a dashboard. Research indicates that employees collaborating primarily with AI report higher levels of loneliness, insomnia, and alcohol consumption. The removal of the "friction" of other people also removes the psychological nourishment of social connection. The "I Did It" echoes in an empty room. The victory is absolute, but it is solitary.34

3.4.2 Time Compression and Unreality

AI compresses time. What took weeks takes minutes.

• The "Effort Heuristic": We often judge quality by the time invested. If a project takes 2 days instead of 2 months, does the user value it less?
• Virtual Time: Just as Virtual Reality compresses the perception of time (making hours feel like minutes), AI compresses the reality of production time. This "time compression" can lead to a sense of unreality—a feeling that the achievement is a "dream" or a "hallucination" rather than a solid fact. The user is "speedrunning" their career, potentially missing the deeper engagement that comes with slow time.37

Chapter IV: The Future of Agency – Homo Curator

We are witnessing a philosophical shift in the definition of the human worker: from Homo Faber (Man the Maker) to Homo Curator (Man the Curator).

4.1 The Shift from Creation to Selection

• Homo Faber: Defined by philosophers like Henri Bergson and Hannah Arendt, this is man as the tool-maker who controls the environment through fabrication. The "Water Carrier" and the "Mechanic" are Homo Faber.
• Homo Curator: The AI user does not "make" in the traditional sense; they select, edit, and orchestrate. The skill set shifts from generation (how to write the code/how to mix the paint) to discernment (knowing which code is good/which image is evocative). The "I Did It" of the future is an assertion of taste and judgment rather than execution.39

4.2 The Conductor Metaphor

The most viable future model for the "I Did It" sentiment is the Orchestral Conductor.41

• The Conductor's Agency: The conductor plays no instrument. They make no sound. They do not sweat from the exertion of bowing a cello. Yet, they are undeniably the author of the performance. Their "I Did It" is valid.
• Orchestrating AI: The future user will claim "I Did It" in the same way Herbert von Karajan claimed "I performed Beethoven's 9th." The satisfaction comes from the unification of disparate elements into a cohesive whole. The AI agents are the musicians; the user is the conductor holding the baton of intent.
• The Challenge: This requires a shift in education and culture to value vision and integration over specialization and exertion. It also requires the "conductor" to have deep knowledge of the music, even if they cannot play every instrument. The danger is a "conductor" who doesn't know the score.43

4.3 The "Analog Rebellion" and the Return to Friction

As digital "doing" becomes effortless, we are seeing a counter-trend of "unnecessary effort."

• The Return to Craft: The explosion of hobbies like sourdough baking, woodworking, pottery, and marathon running (the modern "water carrying") suggests a psychological need to reclaim the "heavy" "I Did It."
• The Bifurcation of Doing: Humans may split "doing" into two categories:
  1. Economic Doing (AI-Mediated): "I implemented 2 projects in 2 days to make money." (Low somatic satisfaction, high economic value).
  2. Existential Doing (Body-Mediated): "I walked 10km to hike a mountain." (High somatic satisfaction, zero economic value).
     The book can explore how modern humans essentially "roleplay" the struggle of their ancestors (via CrossFit or hiking) to feel the "Reward Positivity" that their day jobs no longer provide.

Chapter V: Book Framework – Topics, Visuals, and Logic

To proceed with writing the book, the following structural framework is proposed, organizing the research into a coherent narrative arc.

5.1 Proposed Chapter Structure

Part I: The Weight of Water (The Past)

• Topic: The biological imperative of effort.
• Sub-topics: The "Water-Saving Ape" evolution; the caloric economy of survival; the social structure of the well.
• Key Logic: Effort = Value. Survival is a daily "I Did It."
• Art Reference: The Water Carriers (Knight), The Man with the Hoe (Millet).

Part II: The Iron Lever (The Industrial Transition)

• Topic: The mechanization of the human body.
• Sub-topics: The Roman Aqueduct as the first AI; The Steam Engine; Taylorism and the fragmentation of the soul; The "Machine Stops" prophecy.
• Key Logic: Effort is shared with the machine. Agency becomes "Operating" rather than "Doing."
• Art Reference: Powerhouse Mechanic (Hine), Machinery (Sheeler).

Part III: The Silicon Mind (The Present)

• Topic: The cognitive abstraction and the speed of light.
• Sub-topics: From punch cards to prompts; The "One-Person Unicorn"; The loneliness of the digital god; The IKEA effect in the age of magic.
• Key Logic: Effort is mental/curatorial. Value = Speed x Scale.
• Art Reference: Stock imagery of server farms vs. solitary coders; Digital generative art (refracting the human input).

Part IV: The Conductor’s Baton (The Future)

• Topic: Redefining satisfaction in a post-labor world.
• Sub-topics: Homo Curator; The Conductor metaphor; The crisis of competence (Junior Devs); The Analog Rebellion (why we still bake bread).
• Key Logic: Agency is Intent. Satisfaction comes from Vision and Curation.
• Art Reference: An image of a conductor leading an invisible orchestra; A cyborg hand crafting a clay pot.

5.2 Visual Reference Table

Conclusion: The Unbearable Lightness of Being Productive

The trajectory from "I walked 10kms to get water" to "I implemented 2 big projects in 2 days" is a story of liberation from the tyranny of physics. We have traded the burden of the body for the burden of the mind.

The "Water Carrier" suffered from physical exhaustion but enjoyed clarity of purpose, social connection, and an undeniable link between effort and reward. The "AI Implementer" suffers from "existential weightlessness"—the anxiety that their achievements are ephemeral, their skills are obsolete, and their agency is an illusion.

The book must conclude that the "I Did It!" of the future will not be a roar of physical triumph, but a quiet assertion of curatorial will. It will be the "I Did It" of the gardener who watches the flowers bloom—acknowledging that while they prepared the soil (the prompt), the sun and the seed (the AI) did the growing. The challenge for humanity is to find dignity in the role of the gardener, and to remember that we can always choose to walk the 10km, not because we have to, but because we are human.

Final Recommendations for the Author

1. Emphasize the "Friction": The key to satisfaction is friction. The book should explore how we design meaningful friction back into our AI workflows to preserve the Sense of Agency.
2. Use "The Machine Stops" as a Frame: Use Forster's story as a recurring motif to anchor the technological optimism in cautionary wisdom.
3. Validate the "New Doing": Do not simply demonize the AI achievement. Acknowledge that "2 projects in 2 days" is a miracle. The goal is to integrate this miracle with our paleolithic brains without going insane.

Citations:

1

Works cited

1. Humans Evolved to Be the Water-Saving Ape | Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, accessed January 26, 2026, https://evolutionaryanthropology.duke.edu/news/humans-evolved-be-water-saving-ape
2. Work/labour | Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/worklabour
3. Water and civilization: learning from the past - Fundación We Are Water, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.wearewater.org/en/insights/water-and-civilization-learning-from-the-past/
4. Domesticating Water - Sapiens.org, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/agriculture-water-crisis/
5. Effort Justification | FunBlocks AI, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.funblocks.net/thinking-matters/classic-mental-models/effort-justification
6. Effort Justification: Cognitive Dissonance & Value, accessed January 26, 2026, https://db.arabpsychology.com/effort-justification/
7. The Effect of Perceived Effort on Reward Valuation: Taking the Reward Positivity (RewP) to Dissonance Theory - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 26, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7241252/
8. What hunter-gatherers demonstrate about work and satisfaction | Aeon Essays, accessed January 26, 2026, https://aeon.co/essays/what-hunter-gatherers-demonstrate-about-work-and-satisfaction
9. Pipe Dreams: How the West went from bathing daily to rarely and back again in 2,000 (mostly very stinky) years - USC Dornsife, accessed January 26, 2026, https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/pipe-dreams/
10. The 2,000-Year-Old Water System That Still Beats Modern Cities | Ancient Rome's Aqueducts - YouTube, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvtsiVVaBh0
11. The Ingenious Design of Aqueducts: Ancient Marvels of Water Engineering - Oreate AI Blog, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.oreateai.com/blog/the-ingenious-design-of-aqueducts-ancient-marvels-of-water-engineering/c4706f2bc398d5572dc9e85303bc9a8b
12. The History of Plumbing Around the World - BigRentz, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.bigrentz.com/blog/very-not-boring-history-plumbing
13. The Water Carriers | Detroit Institute of Arts Museum, accessed January 26, 2026, https://dia.org/collection/water-carriers-51080
14. Water Carriers, Venice | Smithsonian American Art Museum, accessed January 26, 2026, https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/water-carriers-venice-7656
15. accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.enotes.com/topics/man-with-hoe#:~:text=The%20worker%20is%20described%20as,intellect%2C%20creativity%2C%20and%20individuality.
16. The Man With The Hoe Analysis - Literary devices and Poetic devices, accessed January 26, 2026, https://literarydevices.net/the-man-with-the-hoe/
17. Analysis | PDF | Poetry | God - Scribd, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/357262303/Analysis
18. Fernand Léger and the Rise of the Man-Machine - Hyperallergic, accessed January 26, 2026, https://hyperallergic.com/fernand-leger-centre-pompidou-metz/
19. Lewis Hine's Iconic 1921 Photograph: Industrial Harmony Explored - History101.NYC, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.history101.nyc/mechanic-and-steam-pump-1921
20. The American Art Style that Idolized the Machine - JSTOR Daily, accessed January 26, 2026, https://daily.jstor.org/the-american-art-style-that-idolized-the-machine/
21. (PDF) Technological Dystopia in E M Forster's 'The Machine Stops' - ResearchGate, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378526658_Technological_Dystopia_in_E_M_Forster's_'The_Machine_Stops'
22. Technology and the Fleshly Interface in Forster's “The Machine Stops”: An Ecocritical Appraisal of a One, accessed January 26, 2026, https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/joe/article/download/98/269/839
23. Fear the Machine: EM Forster's “The Machine Stops” | A Study of the Hollow Earth, accessed January 26, 2026, https://thesymzonian.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/fear-the-machine-em-forsters-the-machine-stops/
24. The Evolution of Software Development: From Manual Coding to AI-Generated Code and the Security Implications | Simon Roses Femerling – Blog, accessed January 26, 2026, https://simonroses.com/2024/08/the-evolution-of-software-development-from-manual-coding-to-ai-generated-code-and-the-security-implications/
25. The Evolution of Software Development: From Solo Coders to AI-Powered Teams - kluster.ai, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.kluster.ai/blog/evolution-of-software-development
26. Is AI eradicating the junior developer? - CIO, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.cio.com/article/4120168/is-ai-eradicating-the-junior-developer.html
27. Tech CEOs reckon with the impact of AI on junior developers - LeadDev, accessed January 26, 2026, https://leaddev.com/leadership/tech-ceos-reckon-with-impact-junior-developers
28. The sense of agency in emerging technologies for human–computer integration: A review, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.949138/full
29. The sense of agency in emerging technologies for human-computer integration: A review, accessed January 26, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36172040/
30. What is the Ikea Effect? - Bloomreach, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.bloomreach.com/en/blog/ikea-effect
31. The IKEA effect in human-AI collaboration. Part I. - Marketing Science & Inspirations, accessed January 26, 2026, https://msijournal.com/the-ikea-effect-in-human-ai-collaboration-does-the-effect-exist-for-non-physical-products-part-i/
32. The Rise Of The One-Person Unicorn: How AI Agents Are Redefining Entrepreneurship, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/03/11/the-rise-of-the-one-person-unicorn-how-ai-agents-are-redefining-entrepreneurship/
33. The Rise of the One-Person Unicorn: How AI is Redefining Entrepreneurship - Medium, accessed January 26, 2026, https://medium.com/@drtc/the-rise-of-the-one-person-unicorn-how-ai-is-redefining-entrepreneurship-b68325a7e235
34. Is AI Making Us Lonelier at Work? | Psychology Today, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/urban-survival/202507/is-ai-making-us-lonelier-at-work
35. Loneliness, insomnia linked to work with AI systems - American Psychological Association, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2023/06/loneliness-insomnia-ai-systems
36. Using AI at work can make employees feel isolated and lonely | 2024-08-13, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.nrca.net/RoofingNews/using-ai-at-work-can-make-employees-feel-isolated-and-lonely.8-13-2024.12292/details/story
37. When Virtual Reality Makes Time Fly (and When It Doesn't) | Psychology Today, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/illusions-delusions-and-reality/202506/when-virtual-reality-makes-time-fly-and-when-it-doesnt
38. Time Compression in Virtual Reality in - Brill, accessed January 26, 2026, https://brill.com/view/journals/time/9/4/article-p377_377.xml?language=en
39. Large Language Models, and the Humanization of Nature through Artificial Communication | P&D - Philosophy & Digitality - USB Journals, accessed January 26, 2026, https://journals.ub.uni-koeln.de/index.php/phidi/article/view/11658
40. Homo Faber + Artificial Intelligence | Marc Kandalaft, accessed January 26, 2026, https://www.kandalaft.studio/article/homo-faber-artificial-intelligence
41. Conducting change: the effect of a music director's leadership factors on players' performance within the symphony orchestra - Pepperdine Digital Commons, accessed January 26, 2026, https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2546&context=etd
42. Traits and Skills of a Music Director - americanorchestras.org, accessed January 26, 2026, https://americanorchestras.org/traits-and-skills-of-a-music-director/
43. Leading like a conductor: the art of influence and direction - Cambridge Insights, accessed January 26, 2026, https://cambridgeinsights.co.uk/leading-like-a-conductor/
44. Anthropology of Technology | Digital Health Pulse - Faculty Website Directory, accessed January 26, 2026, https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/werstein/post/anthropology-technology